Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) are central to Chhattisgarh’s economic development, contributing significantly to employment and regional output. However, they face persistent challenges such as restricted access to finance, inefficient processes, and low integration of digital tools. Fin Tech services offer a transformative pathway by delivering innovative solutions like digital lending, UPI-based payments, crowd funding, and cloud-based accounting systems. These technologies not only enhance financial accessibility but also improve operational transparency and business sustainability. In the context of Chhattisgarh, where digital infrastructure is steadily improving, FinTech can play a key role in driving inclusive growth and resilience among MSMEs. This study explores how FinTech adoption can address existing gaps and contribute to the long-term sustainability of MSMEs in the region.

Euthanasia, or mercy killing, is a subject of intense legal, ethical, and social debate worldwide. In India, the issue is particularly complex due to the interplay of constitutional rights, cultural values, religious beliefs, and medical ethics. This paper examines euthanasia in India from a multidisciplinary legal perspective, tracing its historical evolution, current legal status, and surrounding moral discourse. It reviews key judicial developments, particularly the landmark Supreme Court ruling in Common Cause v. Union of India (2018), which legalized passive euthanasia and upheld advance medical directives. The classification of euthanasia active, passive, voluntary, non-voluntary, and involuntary is discussed, along with the ethical dilemmas each presents. While active euthanasia involves a deliberate act to cause death, passive euthanasia refers to withdrawal of life support, raising debates on the moral difference between acts and omissions. The paper further examines Article 21 of the Constitution, where the “right to life” has evolved to include the “right to die with dignity.” Ethical concerns, including medical obligations, autonomy, and religious viewpoints, are addressed to provide a holistic understanding. A comparative study of laws in the Netherlands, Belgium, Canada, Australia, and the United States highlights global perspectives relevant to India. Euthanasia raises constitutional and ethical challenges, with critics warning of potential misuse against vulnerable groups, while supporters stress autonomy and relief from suffering. The Law Commission’s reports and principles of beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice remain central to the debate. Ultimately, robust legal safeguards and ethical oversight are essential to balance compassion with caution in regulating euthanasia in India.